<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Critiqal&#187; Websites</title>
	<atom:link href="http://critiqal.com/tag/websites/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://critiqal.com</link>
	<description>Everybody is a critiq - we just happen to like sharing our opinions.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 02:46:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>One Website Claims Craig Not Bond</title>
		<link>http://critiqal.com/one-website-claims-craig-not-bond/11/</link>
		<comments>http://critiqal.com/one-website-claims-craig-not-bond/11/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 May 2006 22:23:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Reid Currier</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Web Finds]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Daniel Craig]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[James Bond 007]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Websites]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themindschewtoy.com/2006/05/17/one-website-claims-craig-not-bond/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[While I was trying to find the poster for the new James Bond film Casino Royale (2006), I stumbled across a website &#8211; craignotbond.com. This website claims that Daniel Craig is not suited for the role of James Bond, due to his pockmarked complexion, his utter lack of suaveness, and (of course) his blond locks. [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://critiqal.com/one-website-claims-craig-not-bond/11/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
