Fun with Dick and Jane (2005) [Review]

90 min December 21, 2005 |

Plot: Dick (Carrey) and Jane (Leoni) are happy. Their son, Billy, is happy. Dick has just gotten promoted at his job. But wait – his job has just gone bankrupt. Now he has no job. How will he support his family? He could get another job. No, no one wants poor Dick. What will he and Jane do?

Reviewed

After the success we had with Last Holiday (2006), we decided to give comedy another try this weekend, and check out Fun With Dick And Jane.

If you’re like me, you’ve never seen the 1977 version of the film starring George Segal and Jane Fonda. Most likely, all you know is that it might be based on the classic Dick and Jane books for new readers. So, would Jim Carrey be able to turn that rather simple idea into something worth watching, or would Tea Leoni help destroy the film just like she did Deep Impact (1998)?

Jim Carrey has a definite knack for comedy. Everyone knows that. Whether he’s playing a pet detective (Ace Ventura: Pet Detective (1994)), a green-faced caricature (both The Mask (1994) and , to different degrees), a lawyer who can’t tell a lie (Liar Liar (1997)) or a man given God’s powers (Bruce Almighty (2003)), he has the knack for making almost anything funny on-screen. And he doesn’t stop with what the viewer sees in the final film either – every DVD proudly showcases a few of his other comedic routines in “Gag Reels” or “Bloopers”.

Does it really matter who he’s paired with? No, not really. He can be funny with anyone. Thankfully, that’s the case, as Tea Leoni contributes very very little to the comedy in Fun With Dick And Jane. Not content with just breaking up “The X-Files” (TV) (by demanding hubby David Duchovny spend more time at home), she seems to want to destroy every film she touches. She’s been thwarted before, but it took two people (Will Smith and Martin Lawrence) to stop her then (Bad Boys (1995)).

Now, it’s only Jim Carrey in her way for this film – but he rises to the challenge, and does what he can to keep the audience rolling with laughter, rather than heading for the exits. The other characters, including a very old looking Alec Baldwin, contribute very little to the film. Fun With Dick And Jane is Jim’s toy, and he plays it up as much as he can.

The plot starts off well – Carrey is set up to take the public fall for his company, and goes crazy trying to provide for his family afterwards. This eventually leads him to commit crimes – mostly armed robbery using a water pistol. His wife, not to be left out, joins in on the action, and the two of them go on a Bonnie and Clyde-like spree of robberies.

But then, just when the film has really started getting fun, they sober up, and it switches to a more of an Ocean’s 11 big-heist film – and the viewer is left a little in the dust. Why the big switcheroo? Ah yes, so the movie will end well, rather than the two of them going down in a haze of bullets or something. Sure, the heist part is fun to watch as well, but it’s a totally different film. It almost seems as if the filmmakers just needed to find something to make the movie into a happy ending, and the heist was the only thing they could come up with.

It’s rather interesting that during the “Press Junkets” feature, Jim Carrey mentions that this was a perfect time to do a remake of the film, after the fall of Enron. Huh? So right when people are recovering from personal disaster is the time to make a comedy about that personal disaster? Think of all the people who were affected by the fall of Enron. Do you think they want to see a comedy about it now? I doubt it. A drama, more likely. But something that pokes fun at how desperate their situation may have become? Hardly.

Despite Jim Carrey’s best efforts, Fun With Dick And Jane doesn’t deserve a place next to his great comedies. It’s decent enough to while away time on a Sunday afternoon, but nothing worth watching twice.

My advice? Wait for this one to hit the movie channels or TBS.

    Fun with Dick and Jane (2005) has a running time of 1 hr 30 mins and is rated for brief language, some sexual humor and occasional humorous drug references. Want to learn more? Visit and the IMDB Page .

What did you think of this film?
Rate the film and share your comments below!

DVD Features

  • Widescreen
  • Animated Menus
  • Scene Access
  • Feature-Length Audio Commentary with Director Dean Parisot, Writers Judd Apatow and Nicholas Stoller
  • Gag Reel
  • 6 Deleted Scenes
  • Press Junket Highlights

About

An ex-Floridian, ex-Baltimorian now living in Arizona, Reid wants to get into a career that involves web-design, but for now enjoys working on critiQal in his spare time.


    You are viewer # 487 (since we started counting that sort of thing).

Around the Web


Go on, click it. You know you want to.